Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State v. Howe

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 2014No. 20130299PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

[¶ 1] Attorney Henry H. Howe objected to a report of a hearing panel of the Disciplinary Board recommending that he be suspended from the practice of law for six months, that he pay costs and expenses of the proceedings and that he provide an accounting to his former clients of all costs and expenses incurred during the course of Howe’s representation. We conclude clear and convincing evidence establishes Howe violated N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 1.1, competence; 1.3, diligence; and 1.4, communication. We order that Howe be suspended from the practice of law for six months and one day, that he pay…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. MONREALBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2001
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  3. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. HannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State v. DyerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. HoffmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the North Dakota v. HoweNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. WardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Howe v. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API