Legal Opinion

Gorman v. Costello

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 27, 2007PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

McCAFFERY, J.:

¶ 1 Appellants, Patricia Gorman and Paul Gorman, appeal from the judgment entered following the denial of their motion for post-trial relief. After careful review of the certified record, the parties’ briefs and applicable law, we vacate the judgment and remand for a new trial.

¶ 2 The facts and procedural history underlying this appeal are as follows. On January 30, 2003, as Appellant was driving,1 her vehicle was struck by a vehicle driven by Appellee, Brenda Costello-Viola.2 Appellant was taken by ambulance to the hospital, where she underwent a CT scan of her head…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Quinby v. Plumsteadville Family Practice, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. McManamon v. WashkoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Commonwealth v. BraceySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Jeter v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Fleishman v. General American Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Ramalingam v. Keller Williams Realty Group, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Straw, J. v. Fair, K. v. Pittsburgh LubesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Krepps, F. v. Snyder, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Polett v. Public Communications, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Schmidt v. Boardman Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API