Legal Opinion

Ramalingam v. Keller Williams Realty Group, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 18, 2015No. 2185 EDA 2014PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

PLATT, J.:

Appellant, Govindaraju Ramalingam, appeals from the judgment entered, after a bench trial, in favor of Appellees, Keller Williams Realty Group, Inc. and Keller Williams real estate agent, Janet Palladi-no, defendants at the trial. Appellant personally handed over to the builder his check as a deposit for the construction of a house, as required in the agreement of sale he signed. Nevertheless, he maintains that Appellee Palladino was liable for not placing his deposit payment into escrow, or advising him to do so. We conclude that the trial court correctly decided that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Duquesne University of Holy GhostSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Basile v. H & R BLOCK, INC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Mudano v. Phila. Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. In Re Private Criminal Complaint of WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. In Re Estate of BreyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BetheaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Conquest v. WMC Mortgage Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Maisano v. Marsha Avery, Hamlet Villas, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Deal, M. v. The Children's Hosp. of PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Pass, R. v. Palmiero Automotive of ButlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API