Legal Opinion
Keister v. PPL Corp.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 6, 2015No. 4:13-cv-00118PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
Matthew W. Brann, United States District Judge
This decision evaluates dual Motions for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants PPL Corporation and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 1600 Union, as well as a Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions filed solely by PPL. Because the Court finds that there are no genuine issues of material fact precluding summary judgment on any of Plaintiffs claims, Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment are both granted in full. In addition, PPL’s Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions is held in abeyance pending a hearing before this Court.
I.…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Amaechi v. Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- Clowney v. URS/AECOM, URS Federal ServicesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Deitrick v. CostaDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- MAY v. ELK PIPELINE, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
- MAY v. ELK PIPELINE, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.