Legal Opinion
MAY v. ELK PIPELINE, INC.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 18, 2021No. 1:18-cv-10311Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE : WILLIAM MAY, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Civil No. 18-10311 (RBK/AMD) : v. : OPINION : ELK PIPELINE, INC., : : Defendant. : : : : : KUGLER, United States District Judge: This matter comes before the Court upon Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) (Doc. 45). For the reasons detailed herein, Defendant’s motion is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND This case stems from a labor dispute. Plaintiffs William May, John Cavallaro, Ryan Bogner, Leroy Henicks, and John Truman (“Plaintiffs”) were…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.