Legal Opinion

People v. Randall

California Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1970No. Crim. 13934PublishedCited by 137 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SULLIVAN, J.

Defendant M. A. Randall was charged by an amended information with one count of grand theft. (Pen. Code, § 487.1.)1 After *951a jury trial he was found guilty as charged and was sentenced to state prison for the term prescribed by law. He appeals from the judgment of conviction.

Defendant contends that his confession to the above charge was obtained in violation of the rules announced in Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 [16 L.Ed.2d 694, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 10 A.L.R.3d 974] and that its introduction in evidence over his objection constitutes reversible error. We have concluded…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. People v. IrelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. People v. FiorittoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by137 opinions

  1. Fare v. Michael C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. People v. CrittendenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People v. MurtishawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  5. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

132 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API