Legal Opinion

People v. Fioritto

California Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1968No. Crim. 11948PublishedCited by 206 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMosk, J.

Defendant Peter Paul Fioritto appeals from a judgment convicting him of burglary in the second degree. (Pen. Code, §459.) At trial the People introduced into evidence a confession signed by defendant, and defendant contends that this confession was elicited under circumstances that were violative of the standards enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 [16 L.Ed.2d 694, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 10 A.L.R.3d 974], We conclude that under the explicit directives of Miranda defendant’s confession was inadmissible, and accordingly the judgment must be reversed.

De…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. People v. LaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. People v. SchaderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. People v. JacobsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by206 opinions

  1. Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. People v. IrelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. People v. LucasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. People v. Eric J.California Supreme Court · 1979
  5. People v. DeVaughnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977

201 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API