Legal Opinion

United States v. Robert M. Cole, Defendant-Counterclaimant-Appellant, Group II Commercial Real Estate, Inc., a California Corporation, on Counterclaim

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 15, 1984No. 83-2238PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUG, Circuit Judge:

Robert M. Cole appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the United States in this action seeking satisfaction of a federal tax debt owed by Concord Smorgy Boys (“Concord Smorgy”). Cole, acting as escrow agent, held and disbursed funds he received as a result of the sale of Concord Smorgy’s business. The summary judgment awarded the United States the funds remaining in escrow and held Cole personally liable under 31 U.S.C. § 3713 for Concord Smorgy’s unpaid tax liability to the extent Cole paid other creditors out of the escrow fund ahead of the United…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Gilbert Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Bramwell v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Illinois Ex Rel. Gordon v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. United States v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. UNITED STATES v. MOORE Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. CoppolaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. CoppolaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. Vertac Chemical Corp.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1987
  4. In Re Milspec, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1988
  5. Federal Trade Commission v. CrittendenDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API