Legal Opinion
United States v. Vertac Chemical Corp.
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided September 9, 1987No. LR-C-80-109, LR-C-80-110PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
HENRY WOODS, District Judge.
FINDINGS OF FACT
I.The Corporate Structure of Vertac
1. Vertac ceased all of its manufacturing operations at its Jacksonville site in May 1986. From June 30, 1986, Vertac’s business consisted of marketing agricultural chemical products. Vertac would purchase raw chemicals, formulate them into product and sell the product. Vertac would also buy formulated product and resell it.
2. Vertac had a supply contract with Dow Chemical, U.S.A. (“Dow”) under which it would purchase raw product from Dow for resale, with the latter receiving…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Jefferson CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- J. W. Durrett, Sr. v. The Washington National Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Conservation Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1985
- United States v. State Bank of NCSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Louisiana-Pacific Corp. v. Asarco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Hercules, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- CPC International, Inc. v. Aerojet-General Corp.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1991
- United States v. Golden Acres, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1988
- Kelley v. Thomas Solvent Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.