Legal Opinion

Federal Trade Commission v. Crittenden

District Court, C.D. California

Decided March 16, 1993No. CV 91-2019-JGD (TX)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IRS’ MOTION TO DISALLOW RECEIVER’S INTENDED DISTRIBUTION TO FRANCHISE TAX BOARD

DAVIES, District Judge.

On February 16, 1993, the Internal Revenue Service filed its Motion to Disallow the Receiver’s Intended Distribution to the Franchise Tax Board. After reviewing the respective parties’ written submissions, the Court HEREBY GRANTS the Internal Revenue Service motion and ORDERS the Receiver to distribute the receivership funds allocated to Defendant Mark R. Crittenden’s tax liability to the Internal Revenue Service.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Defendant Mark R. Crittenden’s copier supply…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Bramwell v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. United States v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. UNITED STATES v. MOORE Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Lakeshore Apartments, Inc. v. United States of America, Elazar Behar Et Ux. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Noriega & Alexander v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1994
  2. LAW OFFICES OF JONATHAN STEIN v. Cadle Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1999
  3. Field v. USADistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API