Legal Opinion

Wenborne-Karpen Dryer Co. v. Cutler Dry Kiln Co., Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 18, 1923No. 279PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

We are presented with a petition for rehearing and what is called a petition for intervention. We have examined the petition for rehearing and are not disposed to entertain it in substance; •but we are regretfully compelled to refuse it even admission to our files.

The form of criticism adopted, and the manner in which what may fairly be called accusations are made, are not in accord with the code of professional manners hitherto recognized in this court. Of the names appended to the petition, but one is that of a member of' this bar, and, knowing the professional activities of the signers, we…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1853

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wenborne-Karpen Dryer Co. v. Dort Motor Car Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
  2. Smith v. American Asiatic Underwriters, Federal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
  3. Western Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  4. Lucas v. Central Missouri Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  5. Wenborne-Karpen Dryer Co. v. Dort Motor Car Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API