Legal Opinion
Wenborne-Karpen Dryer Co. v. Dort Motor Car Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 10, 1926No. 4326Published
1Opinion of the Court
14 F.2d 378 (1926)
WENBORNE-KARPEN DRYER CO.
v.
DORT MOTOR CAR CO. (CUTLER DRY KILN CO., Inc., Intervener).
No. 4326.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
July 10, 1926.
Wm. R. Rummler, of Chicago, Ill., and Cyrus W. Rice, of Grand Rapids, Mich., for appellant.
J. Wm. Ellis, of Buffalo, N. Y. (Carton, Roberts & Stewart, of Flint, Mich., on the brief), for appellee.
Before DENISON, DONAHUE, and MOORMAN, Circuit Judges.
DENISON, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff below, appellant here, is the owner of the Grosvenor patent, No. 1,186,477, of May 6, 1916, covering a process useful in drying varnish upon…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kessler v. EldredSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Rubber Tire Wheel Co. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Foote v. Parsons Non-Skid Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
- Brictson Mfg. Co. v. WoodroughCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922
- Allington v. Shevlin-Hixon Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1924
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.