Legal Opinion

Western Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 25, 1951No. 12867PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Circuit Judge.

On April 23, 1951, this court made an order upon the motion of the Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employees, for leave to intervene herein. In that order the court noted that the Brotherhood was permitted to intervene and become a party to the proceedings before the Board, and found that the Brotherhood is a party and is entitled to be heard in this court upon the pending petition for a review of the Board’s proceedings. Accordingly, the motion for leave to intervene was denied as unnecessary.

It has now been suggested…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Willapoint Oysters, Inc. v. EwingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  2. The William BagaleySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  3. Ex Parte GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  4. Wenborne-Karpen Dryer Co. v. Cutler Dry Kiln Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dargel v. Henderson, Director of Rent StabilizationEmergency Court of Appeals · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API