Smith v. American Asiatic Underwriters, Federal, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.
Following our decision (9 Cir., 127 F.2d 754), appellant and appellee filed petitions for rehearing, and the Secretary of Commerce filed a motion for leave to file an appearance in this court. A rehearing was granted and has been had, and the Secretary’s motion has been submitted. Appellant and appellee have consented to and joined in the motion, each expressing the view that, if the motion were granted, the controversy between appellee and the Secretary could be determined on this appeal. Recognizing as we do that such a determination should be had if possible, we now…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Causey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Mullan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- McLaughlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Western Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Stepp v. McAdamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jameson v. JamesonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
- Rockefeller v. PurcellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
- Shin v. Hawaii Medical Service AssociationDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2022