Legal Opinion

Pardue v. Brinegar

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 18, 2009No. COA08-1367PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELMORE, Judge.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Elizabeth Elaine Pardue owns a tract of land in Wilkes County that adjoins and lies southwest of a tract owned by defendants Michael Brinegar, April Brinegar, and Frances Brinegar (the Brinegars). Pardue commenced a quiet title action on 31 May 2007 in order to determine the true boundary line between Pardue’s and the Brinegars’ tracts. Both parties claimed ownership of a 0.79 acre disputed zone.

Pardue’s chain of title described the boundary with the Brinegars’ tract as:

BEGINNING on a white oak in the old S.P. Smith line and runs up the branch, South 11…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brown v. HodgesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Sherrod v. . BattleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. North Carolina Industrial Capital, LLC v. ClaytonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  5. Power Co. v. . SavageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hutchinson v. FenderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  2. Pardue v. BrinegarCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  3. Perry v. TillettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API