Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Carney v. Barnett

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 21, 1967No. 33602PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOSEPH S. LORD, III, District Judge.

Plaintiff, as administratrix ad prosequendum and as administratrix of the estate of her deceased husband, instituted a Wrongful Death action and a Survival action on June 6, 1963 to recover damages for the death of her husband from thallium poisoning. At trial the court directed a verdict for the defendant 1 ruling that the suit was barred by the Statute of Limitations. Plaintiff seeks a new trial, assigning as reasons the directed verdict, and also the court’s denial of plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend her complaint to plead breach of warranty.

D…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Gunning v. CooleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. Smith v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Anthony v. Koppers Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. DeMartino v. Albert Einstein Medical CenterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Taylor v. TukanowiczSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Grubb v. Albert Einstein Medical CenterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Greenberg v. McCabeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API