Legal Opinion
State v. Lopez
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 24, 2006No. AC 26126; AC 26216PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DRANGINIS, J.
These appeals concern claims raised by the defendants, Clifton E. Kennedy and Albert Lopez, who were codefendants at trial. The juiy found each defendant guilty of robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-134 (a) (4), unlawful restraint in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-96 (a), and larceny in the sixth degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-119 and 53a-125b (a). On appeal, Kennedy claims that (1) there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction of robbery in the first degree and (2) the trial court…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. ColonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. MerriamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. NixonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. BordeauxCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- State v. QuintConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. ReConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- State v. WilliamsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. WhiteConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.