Legal Opinion

United States v. Bordeaux

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 27, 2018No. 17-486-cr; August Term 2017PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

José A. Cabranes, Circuit Judge:

This case presents two questions: (1) whether first-degree robbery in violation of Connecticut General Statutes section 53a-134(a)(4) qualifies as a "violent felony" under the so-called elements clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act of 1984 ("ACCA"), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(i) ; and (2) whether Defendant-Appellant Aldric Bordeaux's three prior convictions were for offenses "committed on occasions different *192from one another" within the meaning of ACCA, id. § 924(e)(1). We answer in the affirmative to both questions and therefore AFFIRM the February 17, 2017…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  3. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Welch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  2. Wooden v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
  3. United States v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
  4. United States v. James HennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  5. United States v. Quentin PerryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API