Legal Opinion
State v. Quint
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 15, 2006No. AC 24389PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
The defendant, Richard R. Quint, appeals from the judgments of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of three counts of criminal violation of a protective order, pursuant to General Statutes § 53a-223 (a), and three counts of criminal trespass in the first degree, in violation of General Statutes § 53a-107 (a) (2). On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) his convictions violated his constitutional protection against double jeopardy, and (2) he was denied his right to a fair trial as a result of prosecutorial misconduct during trial and closing arguments.1 We disagree and…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. ColonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. GibsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- State v. PelosoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- State v. SwainConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- State v. MooreConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- State v. MuchaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.