Legal Opinion

Yeager v. Alvarez

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 6, 2012No. AC 32702PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEACH, J.

This case presents the issue of how proceeds of a negligence action are to be distributed between the employer, which intervened for the purpose of recovering workers’ compensation payments, and the employee’s attorney. We hold that the “reasonable and necessary” expenditures recoverable under General Statutes § 31-293 (a) are different from the enumerated fees and costs recoverable from an opposing party in a civil action. The plaintiff-employee, Donna Yeager, appeals from the trial court’s judgment granting the motion of the intervening plaintiff-employer, Priority Care,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wiseman v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  2. Duni v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  3. Lopa v. Brinker International, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  4. Thomas v. Department of Developmental ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  5. Cruz v. MontanezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Konover v. KolakowskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  2. Parnoff v. YuilleConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  3. Paniccia v. Success Village Apartments, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2025
  4. Peterson v. McAndrewConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
  5. Speer v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API