Legal Opinion
Medd v. Fonder
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 13, 1996No. Civil 950234PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
Margaret Medd appealed from a district court order denying her motion for leave to serve a supplemental complaint to join Great American Insurance Company and Walle Mutual Insurance Company as garnishees in her action against Drew Fonder. We affirm and remand for an award of attorney fees.
I
Medd was injured while working as a bartender at the Bronze Boot on February 9, 1989, when an off-duty fellow employee, Fonder, caused her to fall and injure her back.
In April 1990, Medd sued Fonder, alleging in the first count that Fonder “physically assaulted” her by “physically forcing…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miller v. ShugartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- First National Bank of Hettinger v. ClarkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- Sellie v. North Dakota Insurance Guaranty Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Hummel v. Mid Dakota Clinic, P.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- In the Interest of B.D.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Fisher v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Hanneman v. Continental Western Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. v. ClarkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- D.E.M. v. AllicksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Forsman v. Blues Brews and Bar-B-Ques Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.