Legal Opinion

In re Snell

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 19, 1883PublishedCited by 35 opinions

Habeas corpus with certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtBerry, J.

On examination before a justice of the peace upon a charge of larceny from the person, the petitioner was ordered to recognize in the sum of $3,000, for his appearance at the next general term of the district court of Goodhue county, and, upon failure so to do, was committed to jail. The testimony of the witnesses upon the examination was reduced to writing, and returned to and filed in the district court, pursuant to Gen. St. 1878, c. 106, §§ 15, 25. After-wards, upon a habeas corpus, he was brought before one of the district *111judges for Goodhue county, for the purpose of being discharged,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Bollman and SwartwoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1807
  2. People Ex Rel. Tweed v. . LiscombNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. Ex Parte YergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  4. Ex Parte BurfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
  5. People Ex Rel. Lawrence v. . BradyNew York Court of Appeals · 1874

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Durner v. HueginWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Miskimmins v. ShaverWyoming Supreme Court · 1899
  3. State v. FlorenceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. Eureka County Bank Habeas Corpus CasesNevada Supreme Court · 1912
  5. State Ex Rel. McCaffrey v. ShanksCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API