Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Faust

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided October 1, 2003No. 03-0952-CRPublished

1ConcurrenceNettesheim, J.

¶ 18. (concurring). With little confidence, I join the majority opinion. My hesitancy about this case stems not from the majority opinion, but rather from the case on which it is founded — State v. Krajewski, 2002 WI 97, 255 Wis. 2d 98, 648 N.W.2d 385, cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1089 (2002). In my judgment, Krajewski is internally inconsistent and sends mixed signals. I join my colleagues in this case only because an isolated passage in Krajewski mandates an affirmance and I, like the majority, am bound by the pronouncements of our supreme court. See Cook v. Cook, 208 Wis. 2d 166, 189, 560 N.W.2d…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In RE MARRIAGE OF COOK v. CookWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. BohlingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. WalstadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. BurkmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. KiefferWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API