Legal Opinion
State v. Marshall
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided February 5, 2002No. 01-1403-CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurley, J.
¶ 1. Donald D. Marshall appeals from a judgment entered after he pled guilty to one *414count of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated (OWI) (fifth offense), contrary to Wis. Stat. § 346.63(l)(a) (1999-2000).1 Marshall also appeals from the trial court's order denying his postconviction motion. Marshall claims that: (1) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to move to suppress the blood alcohol evidence, which he alleges was obtained in violation of Wis. Stat. § 343.305(9)(a); and (2) two "new factors" establish grounds for modification of his sentence. We disagree and affirm.
I.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- In RE MARRIAGE OF COOK v. CookWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. PettitCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
- State v. PitschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. BentleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. PadleyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2014
- State v. KrajewskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. HaukCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
- Mid-State Contracting, Inc. v. Superior Floor Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
- County of Trempealeau v. Layne Perry StenbergCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2026
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.