Legal Opinion
Hauck v. Danclar
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 15, 1993PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
262 N.J. Super. 225 (1993)
620 A.2d 479
MARILYN HAUCK & THOMAS HAUCK, PLAINTIFF,
v.
WAYNE DANCLAR, M.D., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division (Civil), Atlantic County.
Decided January 15, 1993.
Stephen Rubino for plaintiff Mary Hauck.
Thomas Vesper for plaintiff Thomas Hauck (McAllister, Westmoreland, Vesper & Schwartz, attorneys).
Jeffrey S. Chiesa for defendants (Dughi and Hewit, attorneys).
OPINION
WINKELSTEIN, J.S.C.
In this case the court is asked to decide if a spouse is entitled to separate counsel while pursuing a per quod claim. It appears to be a question of first…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Dwyer v. JungNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- Patusco v. Prince MacAroni, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
- Schuttler v. ReinhardtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- Judice's Sunshine Pontiac, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kibble v. Weeks Dredging & Construction Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- Alberts v. GaecklerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014
- Carter v. University of Medicine & DentistryDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- Kibble v. Weeks Dredging & Construction Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.