Legal Opinion
Fry v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 7, 2016No. B259791PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHANEY, Acting P. J.
SUMMARY
Appellant City of Los Angeles (City) appeals from the trial court’s issuance of a writ of mandate authorizing the Board of Fire and Police Pension Commissioners of the Los Angeles Fire and Police Pensions (Board) 1 to exercise its discretion, previously delegated to it by the City in an ordinance, to set the maximum subsidy contributed by the City to police and firefighter retirees’ insurance premiums without regard to later City ordinances “freezing” the subsidy until review and increase by the City Council and requiring payment of a voluntary contribution…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Betts v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Valdes v. CoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Retired Employees Ass'n of Orange County, Inc. v. County of OrangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- San Luis Rey Racing, Inc. v. Cal. Horse Racing Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Don't Cell Our Parks v. City of San Diego, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- San Jose Unified School District v. Santa Clara County Office of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Furie v. Furie (In re Furie), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Moen v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.