Legal Opinion
Furie v. Furie (In re Furie)
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided October 30, 2017No. B269972PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChaney, J.
*819This appeal centers on Russell Furie's (father) request for the trial court to enter an order reducing his child support obligations and Kelly Furie's (mother) request for an order regarding the couple's children's orthodontic care and expenses.1 The trial court denied father's request to reduce child support, found that father controls the Douglas Mae Trust (the *820Trust), ordered father to pay the requested orthodontic expenses, and granted mother sole authority to make decisions regarding the children's orthodontic care.2 We affirm the trial court's orders.
BACKGROUND
Mother and father married…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Retz v. Samson (In Re Retz)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- In Re Marriage of ArceneauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Rappleyea v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Zevnik v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- In Re Marriage of Brown and YanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Disability Services Corp. v. Butterfield CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Little v. Law Office of Dominic Trutanich CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Marriage of Brown CA CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Paul Blanco's Good Car Co. Auto Group v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2020