Legal Opinion

Anchester v. Keck

California Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1931No. Docket No. L.A. 10691PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

The petition for a hearing was granted in this cause after decision by the District Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division Two, Sturtevant, J., writing the opinion of said court, for the purpose of giving this court an opportunity of making a closer examination of a voluminous record than it was possible to do under our appellate system upon petition for hearing. Upon a further examination of the record and the merits of the appeal, which was taken from a judgment entered after an order granting respondents’ motion for a nonsuit, we are of the opinion that the questions presented…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Davey v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Millar v. MillarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Hulen v. StuartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Hoff v. Los Angeles Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lawless v. CalawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Inderbitzen v. Lane HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Wilson v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Hanrahan-Wilcox Corp. v. Jenison MacHinery Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Estate of RabinowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API