Legal Opinion

Dimeo v. Chicago Transit Authority

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 30, 1999No. 1-99-1101PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice South

Plaintiff, Florence Dimeo, appeals from an order of the circuit court of Cook County dismissing her complaint for damages against defendant, Chicago Transit Authority (CTA), for failing to file a proper notice of injury as required by section 41 of the Metropolitan Transit Authority Act (70 ILCS 3605/41 (West 1996)). Plaintiff contends that the CTA was estopped from objecting to any irregularities in her section 41 notice and the alleged defect in her notice was de minimis.

On June 28, 1995, plaintiff served a section 41 notice upon the CTA in which she stated that on February 27, 1995, she…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. La Salle National Trust, N.A. v. Village of WestmontAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  2. Repaskey v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Bonner v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  4. Searcy v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  5. Streeter v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cione v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  2. Curtis v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  3. Watson v. HowardAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  4. Davis v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  5. Hemphill v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API