Legal Opinion

Davis v. Chicago Transit Authority

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 14, 2001No. 1-00-1985PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Buckley

Plaintiff, Ruby Davis, filed a negligence complaint against defendant, Chicago Transit Authority (CTA), and its agent, Rouhy Clay,u seeking damages for injuries she sustained while a passenger on a CTA bus. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the CTA pursuant to section 2 — 1005 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Code) (735 ILCS 5/2 — 1005 (West 1998)) finding plaintiff had failed to comply with the notice requirements of section 41 of the Metropolitan Transit Authority Act (the Act) (70 ILCS 3605/41 (West 1998)). On appeal, plaintiff argues that CTA was not entitled to summary…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Purtill v. HessIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Repaskey v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Niziolek v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  4. Bonner v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  5. Dunlap v. Alcuin Montessori SchoolAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hemphill v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  2. Hemphill v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  3. White v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API