Davis v. Chicago Transit Authority
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Buckley
Plaintiff, Ruby Davis, filed a negligence complaint against defendant, Chicago Transit Authority (CTA), and its agent, Rouhy Clay,u seeking damages for injuries she sustained while a passenger on a CTA bus. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the CTA pursuant to section 2 — 1005 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Code) (735 ILCS 5/2 — 1005 (West 1998)) finding plaintiff had failed to comply with the notice requirements of section 41 of the Metropolitan Transit Authority Act (the Act) (70 ILCS 3605/41 (West 1998)). On appeal, plaintiff argues that CTA was not entitled to summary…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Purtill v. HessIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
- Repaskey v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
- Niziolek v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- Bonner v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- Dunlap v. Alcuin Montessori SchoolAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hemphill v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Hemphill v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- White v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007