Legal Opinion
Watson v. Howard
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided May 8, 2001No. 1-00-2686PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
749 N.E.2d 427 (2001)
322 Ill. App.3d 562
255 Ill.Dec. 326
Michael J. WATSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Imogene HOWARD, Indiv. and as Agent, Servant and Employee of the Chicago Transit Authority, and Chicago Transit Authority, Indiv., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 1-00-2686.
Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Second Division.
May 8, 2001.
Claude B. Kahn and Glenn J. Kahn, Kipnis & Kahn, Ltd., Chicago, for Appellant.
Duncan G. Harris, General Counsel, Chicago Transit Authority (Thomas J. Bamonte, First Deputy General Counsel, and Cheryl K. Lipton, Senior Attorney, of counsel), Chicago, for Appellee.
2Opinion of the Court · McBRIDEJustice McBRIDE
P…
3Cases cited15 opinions
- Kravis v. Smith Marine, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
- Almgren v. Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
- Welch v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- McComb v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
- Niziolek v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- Brennan v. KolmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
- Curtis v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- Curtis v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- Brennan v. KolmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002