Legal Opinion
Marion Steam Shovel Co. v. Bertino
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided May 7, 1936No. 10331PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Circuit Judge.
Defendant has filed a petition for rehearing in which counsel reargue the entire case. The function of such a petition is defined and limited by rule 18 of this court. The rule, among other things, provides as follows:
“The sole purpose of a petition for rehearing is to call attention to material matters of law or fact inadvertently overlooked by the court, as shown by its opinion. Mere reargument of issues determined by the opinion will be entirely disregarded.”
One matter is urged, however, which we think is deserving of attention. It is earnestly contended that a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. HallCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1894
- P. F. Collier & Son Co. v. HartfeilCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Reece Folding Mach. Co. v. FenwickCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1905
- City of Chicago v. O'MalleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
- A. F. Withrow Lumber, Co. v. Glasgow Inv. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1901
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hutchinson v. Fidelity Inv. Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
- Mitchell v. GreenoughCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- Nixon v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Carter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Carter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.