Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Greenough

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 16, 1939No. 8874PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

In his petition for rehearing the appellant contends for the first time that the controlling statute of limitations is sec. 159, par. 2 of Remington’s Revised Statutes of Washington, which fixes a period of-three years, and claims that his action is brought within that period. A party cannot on petition for a rehearing shift his position. Marion Steam Shovel Co. v. Bertino, 8 Cir., 82 F.2d 945; Moss v. Sherburne, 1 Cir., 11 F.2d 579; Bassick Mfg. Co. v. Adams Grease Gun Corp., 2 Cir., 54 F.2d 285.

In view of the fact that we adhere to our conclusion that the complaint…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bassick Mfg. Co. v. Adams Grease Gun Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  2. Marion Steam Shovel Co. v. BertinoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
  3. Moss v. SherburneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1926

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Partenweederei, MS Belgrano v. WeigelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  2. United States v. Dwight Eugene SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  3. Sierra Club v. HodelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  4. United States v. Kenneth C. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
  5. United States v. Kenneth C. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API