Legal Opinion

Wat Henry Pontiac, Inc. v. Pitcock

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 17, 1956No. 36991PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNT, Justice.

The plaintiff in error, Wat Henry Pontiac, Inc., hereinafter referred to as the defendant, or corporation, was sued by the defendants in error, Paul E. Pitcock and Robert E. Pitcock, co-partners, d/b/a Ajax Electric Co., hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs, for the sum of $800.14, alleged due for labor and materials furnished defendant. We quote from plaintiffs’ amended petition as follows:

“Plaintiffs allege that said defendant is indebted to plaintiffs in the sum of Eight Hundred and 14/100 Dollars ($800.14), for electrical wiring, fixtures, and labor furnished and performed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Layton v. PurcellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  2. Carter Oil Co. v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  3. Wiggins v. SterneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  4. Edmonston v. HolderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  5. McCray v. Sapulpa Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bane v. Anderson, Bryant & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Florafax International Inc. v. GTE Market Resources, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  3. Walker v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  4. Hames v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  5. Stroud v. Arthur Andersen & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API