Legal Opinion
Pleasants v. Ridge
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 29, 2006No. CIV.A. 00-3094(JMF)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FACCIOLA, United Stated Magistrate Judge.
This case was referred to me, upon consent of the parties, for all purposes including trial. Currently pending for resolution is Plaintiffs Renewed, Motion for Recon- sidemtion (“Pl.’s Mot.”). For reasons stated herein, plaintiffs motion will be granted in part and denied in part.
I. BACKGROUND
The fundamental facts are discussed at length in previous opinions that I have issued in this case. 1 For present purposes, the most significant facts are as follows. Beginning in 1992, Carl Pleasants (“plaintiff’), an African-American male, was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lively v. Flexible Packaging Ass'nDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- American Lands Alliance v. NARTONDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- McAllister v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Berke v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Miller v. HolzmannCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.