Legal Opinion

Ulrich v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided October 1, 1986No. CA CR 86-73PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donald L. Corbin, Judge.

This case comes to us from the Yell County Circuit Court. Appellants, James Ulrich and Olivia Kandur, appeal their convictions for possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. We reverse the trial court’s decision.

Appellants raise the following seven points for reversal:

I

THE AFFIDAVIT FOR SEARCH WARRANT WAS DEFECTIVE IN THAT IT DID NOT REVEAL THE TIME WHEN THE OBSERVATIONS OF THE INFORMANT WERE MADE.

II

PROBABLE CAUSE FOR THE SEARCH WAS LACKING IN THAT THE INFORMATION WAS SUPPLIED BY AN ANONYMOUS INFORMANT.

III

THE MOTION TO SUPPRESS AS TO APPELLANT ULRICH…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  5. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bennett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Fouse v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  3. Heaslet v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
  5. Yancey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API