Sperry v. Tammany
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.
This action involves the determination of the respective interests of decedent and defendant Prank H. Tammany in cash and personal effects. Judgment was rendered in favor of defendant and plaintiff has appealed.
1. Plaintiff assigns error in the determination of the court that a certain automobile was held in joint tenancy by decedent and defendant and in awarding the car to defendant. The automobile was first registered in Louisiana to “Lieutenant Commander Prank H. Tammany and/or Jean S. Tammany.” After defendant was transferred to the Los Angeles area it was registered in California in the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Gibson v. De La Salle InstituteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Miller & Lux, Inc. v. KatzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- Mann v. HigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Berry v. KowalskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bernkrant v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Newberger v. RifkindCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Anderson v. McNallyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Nunez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Borba Farms, Inc. v. AchesonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.