Miller & Lux, Inc. v. Katz
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. John Hunt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
This action is brought against the executrix of the estate of a deceased person to enforce a stockholder’s liability upon an indebtedness incurred by the corporation during the ownership by the estate of shares of stock in such corporation. Plaintiff obtained judgment, and defendant appeals from the judgment and from an order denying her motion for a new trial.
The facts of the case are, briefly, that one Alfred Katz, the appellant’s testator, at the time of his death in 1900, was the owner of one-fourth of the capital stock of Katz & Sons, a corporation. About five years thereafter, to wit,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Whitman v. Oxford National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Matteson v. DentSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Eustace v. JahnsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- School District Number Two v. LambertOregon Supreme Court · 1895
- Kennedy v. California Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Bernkrant v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Western Pac. Ry. Co. v. GodfreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Whittier v. VisscherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Cook v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Lawrence v. DeboerMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.