Mann v. Higgins
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Fresno, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
J. — The complaint avers that for a certain consideration named defendant agreed to pay plaintiff the sum of six thousand four hundred dollars, and that two thousand two hundred dollars of said amount was to be satisfied by the conveyance to plaintiff by defendant of certain described laud which defendant agreed to so convey, leaving four thousand two hundred dollars due plainuff after such conveyance. There was also an averment of an agreement by defendant, made in the same contract, to purchase certain personal property from plaintiff for $475; but as that item was abandoned by plaintiff at…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Breckinridge v. CrockerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by19 opinions
- People v. BeltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Svanburg v. FosseenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Gibson v. De La Salle InstituteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Dillingham v. DahlgrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Brewer v. Horst and Lachmund Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.