Legal Opinion

Clark v. Eaton

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 8, 1921No. 22,981PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Cowley district court; Oliver P. Fuller, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

West, J.:

Sarah E. Spruens died November 12, 1914, leaving her husband as her only heir. May 5, 1917, on the petition of Francis M. Clark, an administrator was appointed. His claim — the only one — was filed against the estate, May 10, 1917, for money lent June 12, 1909, $1,500, about November 12, 1914, $5, interest $720, total, $2,225, with credit for the use of a room, $522 — leaving a balance of $1,703. The claim was allowed by the probate court and an appeal was taken to the district court where the jury returned a verdict in favor of the *575claimant.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bauserman v. CharlottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  2. Collamore v. WilderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  3. Kulp v. KulpSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  4. First National Bank v. KingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  5. Scroggs v. TuttSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Toner v. Conqueror Trust Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  2. Emanuel Home v. BerginSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  3. Robitaille v. MumaughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Loveland v. HemphillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  5. Cartier v. Central Trust Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API