Legal Opinion

State v. Graham

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 17, 1998No. 22109-8-IIPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bridgewater, A.C. J.

— Jeremy Graham appeals his conviction of malicious mischief in the second degree. We are asked to decide whether manifest necessity existed for the trial court to declare a mistrial when the judge realized, after the first witness took the stand, that he was required to disqualify himself under the Code of Judicial Conduct (CJC) Canon 3(D)(1). We hold that where the judge correctly decides he must recuse himself, and there is no evidence of bad faith conduct by the judge, a manifest necessity exists for his recusal. We hold that the judge in this case did not abuse his…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Proc. Against SandersWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding against SandersWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. MeltonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  4. State v. JacksonNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Kauzlarich v. YarbroughCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API