State v. Melton
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Per curiam
After jeopardy attached in John Melton’s first prosecution for robbery and assault, the trial court declared a mistrial due to defense counsel’s absence from trial due to illness. When his second trial commenced, Mel ton unsuccessfully moved to dismiss on the ground that further prosecution was barred by double jeopardy. A jury subsequently convicted him of first degree robbery, and he appeals. Because the court did not abuse its discretion in declaring a mistrial, we affirm.
The State charged Melton with first degree robbery and second degree assault. After the completion of pretrial motions,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Wade v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Brady v. SamahaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Edward StarlingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. SheetsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- State v. SheetsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- People v. WareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.