Legal Opinion

In re the Disciplinary Proceeding against Sanders

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 2006No. 200,271-4PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 — A visit by a judicial officer to a special facility for sexually violent predators is not in itself inappropriate conduct under the Code of Judicial Conduct. However, conversations with the residents of the facility concerning the reasons for their confinement, particularly when one or more of these residents has a matter or matters pending before the court on which the judge sits, can violate the Code of Judicial Conduct. By asking questions of inmates who were litigants or should have been recognized as potential litigants on issues currently pending before the court, Justice Richard…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. In re the Detention of ThorellWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against DemingWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Sherman v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Papa v. New Haven Federation of TeachersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Sanders v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Sanders v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Sanders v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  5. In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against KeenanWashington Supreme Court · 2022

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API