Legal Opinion
Fanning v. SITTON MOTOR LINES, INC.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided February 16, 2010No. Case 08-CV-2464 CM/DJWPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOHN W. LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.
The heirs of decedent Michael Fanning bring this wrongful death action to recover for the damages they have suffered as a result of the decedent’s untimely death. As administrator of the decedent’s estate, Plaintiff Tammy Fanning also brings a survival action against defendants Sitton Motor Lines, Inc. (“Sitton”) and James F. Duke, asserting claims for emotional distress and pain and suffering the decedent allegedly suffered in the moments prior to his death. The matter is presently before the Court on two different motions by defendants…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thom v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Ann Garrison Pamela Bielski Vicky Dunbar Teresita Wells Connie Brady Sherry Conway Patricia Erickson v. Gambro, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Haynes v. Level 3 Communications, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Smith v. PrintupSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sammie Dwayne McPhaul, as Special Administrator of the Estate of Alfred Cornelius McPhaul v. College Hills Opco, LLC, et al.District Court, D. Kansas · 2026