City of Roswell v. Jones
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ZINN, Justice.
Appellees were charged with violating Ordinance 397, Section 3, of the Municipal Ordinances of Roswell, in permitting a lottery device to be conducted in the place of business operated by the appellees. The place of business is the Yucca Theatre, owned by R. C. Griffiths Theatres, Inc., and the alleged lottery device is what is commonly known as “Bank Night.”
In the police magistrate’s court the appellees were found guilty and fined $25 each. They appealed to the district court where the cause was tried de novo. The district court ruled that:
“ * * * the device complained of does…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Glover v. MalloskaMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
- Yellow-Stone Kit v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
- State v. DanzWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- State v. HundlingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
- Society Theatre v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1922
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. JonesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
- Affiliated Enterprises, Inc. v. WallerSuperior Court of Delaware · 1939
- State v. StoutCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1949
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1938
- State Ex Rel. Draper v. LynchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.