Legal Opinion

Nixon v. Selby Smelting & Lead Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1894No. 15204PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Contra Costa County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Vanclief, C.

Action to recover damages for a personal injury alleged to have been suffered by plaintiff while in the employ of defendant, in consequence of the neglect and failure of defendant to provide proper and safe instruments and appliances with which plaintiff was employed to work.

The trial was by jury, and the verdict and judgment was in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of three thousand eight hundred and sixteen dollars.

The plaintiff was employed to work, and at the time he was injured was working, in a room called the “ silver-room,” in which silver is separated from lead and gold…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bowen v. Chicago, Burlington & Kansas City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  2. Burns v. Sennett & MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Daves v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Elledge v. Nat'l City & Otay Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Sanborn v. Madera Flume & Trading Co.California Supreme Court · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Donnelly v. San Francisco Bridge Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Tedford v. Los Angeles Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Mullin v. California Horseshoe Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Higgins v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Skelton v. Pacific Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1903

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API