Legal Opinion

Elledge v. Nat'l City & Otay Ry. Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1893No. 19167PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Temple, C.

Plaintiff sues for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by defendant’s negligence.

Plaintiff avers that he was employed by defendant as a laborer, and engaged under its direction in loading stone upon a car, and “ that the car on which defendant was loading stone, as aforesaid, on said day, was placed by said defendant, and stood during said day near and alongside, to wit: about ten feet of a rock or cliff or embankment; that said cliff was of stone,, and was thought by plaintiff to be solid and secure, and plaintiff, prior to the falling of said cliff as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Daves v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Martin v. Des Moines Edison Light Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. Peirce v. Van DusenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
  3. Donnelly v. San Francisco Bridge Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Tedford v. Los Angeles Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Bundy v. Sierra Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1906

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API