Slater v. Murphy
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.
We are here concerned with the sufficiency of the evidence to warrant the reformation of a deed, and with the sufficiency of the evidence to justify a finding of adverse possession.
The locus in quo is a triangular tract of land lying west of north Wenatchee avenue (which will hereafter be referred to as the highway), in an addition to the city of Wenatchee.
The side of the triangle, which runs approximately north and south is 87.5 feet; the side which runs approximately east and west is 50.1 feet; and the connecting side which is the south westerly line of the highway is 100.9 feet. The tract…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Akers v. SinclairWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- Turnipseed v. MoseleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
- Puget Mill Co. v. KerryWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- Scott v. SlaterWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Skoog v. SeymourWashington Supreme Court · 1947
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re the Marriage of SchweitzerWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Matter of Marriage of SchweitzerWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Jones v. National Bank of Commerce of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- Neal v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- In Re the Welfare of SegoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.