Legal Opinion

Neal v. Green

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1967No. 38782PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Langenbach, J. †

The following facts were found by the trial court. Respondents, Mr. and Mrs. Neal, owned two parcels of land in Yakima County. One parcel, referred to as the motel property, was composed of two contiguous tracts. The other parcel, referred to as the Danker property, was situated a few miles away. In September, 1957, respondents and the appellants Lind signed a real estate contract whereby respondents were to sell the motel prop erty to appellants. Through a mistake, there was included in the real estate contract a description of the Danker property, which property was not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jones v. National Bank of Commerce of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Slater v. MurphyWashington Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kupka v. MoreyAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Leonard v. Washington Employers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Hanson Industries, Inc. v. Spokane CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  4. Pfister v. BrownWyoming Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Fireside Thrift of Hawaii, Inc. v. Kealoha (In Re Kealoha)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Hawaii · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API