State v. Van Vlack
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Thurston county, Mitchell, J., entered August 24,1917, upon a trial and conviction of having possession of clams during the closed season.
1Opinion of the CourtWebster, J.
On July 10, 1917, an information was filed in the superior court against the appellant, the charging part of which is as follows:
‘ ‘ Then and there being, he the said Harry Yan Ylack, did unlawfully have in his possession one sack of clams purchased by him, the said Harry Van Ylack, from one O. A. Schneider, which said clams were taken for the purpose of sale on or about April 26, 1917, and subsequent to April 1, 1917, by said O. A. Schneider from tide lands abutting on Puget Sound and owned by said •0. A. Schneider.”
• To this information, appellant filed a general demurrer, which was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thorpe v. Rutland & Burlington RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1854
- State v. PitneyWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- State ex rel. Case v. HowellWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Sequim Bay Canning Co. v. BuggeWashington Supreme Court · 1908
- Palmer v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. LongshoreWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. LongshoreWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. DexterWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Wiegardt v. BrennanWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Washington State Geoduck Harvest Ass'n v. Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.